Betting the Ranch:

November 3, 2006

241 Candidates Run Up
$9 Million In Campaign Debt

A total of 241 state candidates took out more than $9 million in campaign loans from January 2005 through September 2006. The indebted candidates ran for offices ranging from district attorney to governor. Some of these loans went to candidates who are not running this cycle. These include mid-term sitting senators (such as Juan ‘Chuy’ Hinojosa), as well as ex-candidates who appear to have taken out new loans in an effort to restructure old campaign debts (including failed 2002 Senate candidate Dave Deison).

Indebted candidates reported total loan amounts ranging from $80 to more than $500,000. The top debt-financed candidate is Republican Robert Nichols, who loaned himself $556,000 for his race for an open seat in Senate District 3. Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst came next, loaning his campaign $525,000. Fifty candidates reported borrowing $50,000 or more this cycle. These large debts account for 77 percent (almost $7 million) of debts analyzed here.

Under Texas law, gubernatorial candidates can use campaign funds to repay themselves personal loans of up to $500,000 for every election in which they appear on the ballot (or up to $1 million for a gubernatorial candidate who appears on the primary and general ballot).1

Candidates for all other statewide offices can repay themselves up to $250,000 per on-ballot election. There is no limit on what legislative candidates can repay themselves.

The only candidate who hit these repayment limits as of last month is Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst. Appearing on this year’s primary — and general — election ballots, Dewhurst personally loaned his campaign $525,000 last year. Legally he can use campaign funds to repay up to $500,000 of these five-year, zero-interest loans.

This energy tycoon previously used $11.3 million of his personal funds to win his first lieutenant governor race in 2002. The Dewhurst campaign reported earlier this week that the total principal remaining on all of its outstanding debt surpasses $8 million.

Dewhurst’s Loans
To His ’06 Campaign

Loan
Date
Loan
Amount
6/21/2005
$150,000
6/25/2005
$60,000
6/30/2005
$65,000
12/27/2005
$250,000
TOTAL:
$525,000

 

50 Candidates Borrowed $50,000 Or More In the 2006 Cycle

Cycle
Loan Total
 Candidate
Office
Party
 Running
Status
'06 Primary*
Outcome
$556,000
 Robert Nichols
S-3
R
 Open seat
Won
$525,000
 David Dewhurst
Lt. Gov
R
 Incumbent
Won
$355,000
 Borris Miles
H-146
D
 Challenger
Won
$321,750
 Larry Durrett
H-11
R
 Challenger
Won
$316,671
 Dan Patrick
S-7
R
 Open seat
Won
$300,772
 Mercurio Martinez
H-42
D
 Challenger
Lost
$300,000
 Richard Raymond
H-42
D
 Incumbent
Won
$239,552
 Bill Welch
H-47
R
 Open seat
Won
$235,000
 Frank Denton
S-3
R
 Open seat
Lost
$220,000
 David Melanson
H-28
R
 Open seat
Lost
$207,500
 Bob Wortham
Dist Judge
D
 Open seat
Won
$195,963
 Carlos Uresti
S-19
D
Challenger
Won
$159,400
 David Leibowitz
H-11
D
 Incumbent
Won
$158,301
 Patricia Carlson
H-91
R
 Open seat
Lost
$157,270
 Anette Carlisle
H-87
R
 Challenger
Lost
$150,000
 Eliot Shapleigh
S-29
D
 Incumbent
Won
$137,796
 Juan Hinojosa
S-20
D
 Incumbent
NA
$135,423
 Robert Higgins
H-97
R
 Challenger
Lost
$120,975
 David Deison
S
R
 Open seat
NA
$119,000
 Veronica Gonzales
H-41
D
 Incumbent
Won
$113,500
 Delwin Jones
H-83
R
 Incumbent
Won
$110,000
 'Kinky' Friedman
Gov.
IND
 Challenger
NA
$100,547
 Mike Baldwin
H-28
R
 Open seat
Lost
$100,000
 L. Dee Shipman
Dist Judge
R
 Incumbent
Won
$85,000
 Ron Booker
H-26
R
 Challenger
Lost
$85,000
 Kelly Hancock
H-91
R
 Open seat
Won
$82,000
 Will Hartnett
H-11
R
 Incumbent
Won
$81,000
 Arnulfo 'Arnie' Olivarez
H-38
D
 Open seat
Lost
$80,414
 Eddie Lucio III
H-38
D
 Open seat
Won
$76,100
 Don Zimmerman
H-50
R
 Challenger
Lost
$73,565
 Richard E. Price
Dist Judge
R
 Incumbent
Won
$70,000
 James George Sales
Dist Judge
R
 Open seat
Won
$65,000
 Jeff Fleece
H-50
R
 Challenger
Won
$64,773
 Linda Harper-Brown
H-10
R
 Incumbent
Won
$63,100
 Jose 'Joe' Lopez
Dist Judge
D
 Challenger
Won
$61,000
 Tim Kleinschmidt
H-17
R
 Challenger
Won
$60,867
 Mark Homer
H-3
D
 Incumbent
Won
$60,000
 Eddie Lucio Jr.
S-27
D
 Incumbent
NA
$55,200
 Laura M. Salinas
H-14
D
 Open seat
Lost
$55,000
 Katy Hubener
H-10
D
 Open seat
Won
$55,000
 Mollee Westfall
Dist Judge
R
 Challenger
Won
$53,779
 Joe Straus
H-12
R
 Incumbent
Won
$52,857
 Dick Bowen
S-19
R
 Challenger
Won
$52,794
 Ben Bentzin
H-48
R
 Challenger
Won
$50,460
 Douglas M. Barlow
Dist Judge
D
 Open seat
Lost
$50,107
 Tan Parker
H-63
R
 Open seat
Won
$50,000
 Susan King
H-71
R
 Open seat
Won
$50,000
 Peter Sakai
Dist Judge
D
 Open seat
Won
$50,000
 Dave Kleimann
S-3
R
 Open seat
Lost
$50,000
 Donald Margo
S-29
R
 Challenger
Won
* Includes results of some special elections.

 

Campaign Debts By Running Status

Candidate
Running
Status
Total
Loans
No. of
Indebted Candidates
Average
Debt
 Open Seat
$3,889,832
93
$41,826
 Challenger
$2,647,216
87
$30,428
 Incumbent
$2,449,464
57
$42,973
 Unknown
$17,000
4
$4,250
 TOTALS:
$9,003,512
241
$37,359

 

Campaign Debts By Office

 Office
Total
Loans
No. of
Indebted
Candidates
Average
Debt
 House
$4,807,288
120
$40,061
 Senate
$1,986,505
16
$124,157
 District Judges*
$1,369,092
71
$19,283
 Statewide
$687,741
11
$62,522
 Int. Appeals Court
$124,827
16
$7,802
 Education Board
$23,809
4
$5,952
 District Attorney
$4,250
3
$1,417
 TOTALS:
$9,003,512
241
$37,359
*Includes candidates for two family district court races and one county court at law race.

 

As a practical matter, few losing candidates will be able to tap contributions to repay debts. Most donors have little interest in lost causes when they can invest in winners who actually wield political power.

The primaries already wiped out seven candidates who racked up campaign debts of $100,000 or more. The most indebted primary loser is Democrat Mercurio Martinez, who borrowed $300,772 for his failed primary and run-off challenge to Rep. Richard Raymond (D-Laredo). Martinez loaned himself just over half this amount, borrowing the rest from banks. More candidates with heavy debts will be knocked out in Tuesday’s general election.

On average, incumbents and candidates pursuing open seats incurred more debt, while challengers had smaller appetites for going into debt.

Republicans had more debt-financed candidates than Democrats and the average debt of an indebted Republican exceeded that of the average indebted Democrat.

This raises the question: Can true fiscal conservatives run debt–financed campaigns? The $110,000 that independent gubernatorial candidate Kinky Friedman borrowed from shampoo magnate John McCall accounted for most of the debt incurred independent of the dominant parties.

Three-quarters of the total campaign debt analyzed here went to 136 legislative candidates ($6.8 million). In a potential threat to judicial independence, trial-court candidates—-led by 68 district judges—took out almost $1.4 million in debt. The most indebted of these candidates is Bob Wortham, the Democratic nominee for Beaumont’s 58th state district court seat. Wortham personally lent his campaign $207,500. Sixteen candidates for intermediate appeals courts also borrowed a total of $124,827.

Campaign Debts By Party

Party
Total
Loans
No. of
Indebted Candidates
Average
Debt
Republican
$5,631,547
136
$41,408
Democrat
$3,200,569
95
$33,690
Other
$118,396
6
$19,733
Unknown
$53,000
4
$13,250
TOTALS:
$9,003,512
241
$37,359

 

Statewide Campaign Debt Breakdown

 Office
Total
Loans
No. of
Indebted
Candidates
Average
Debt
 Lieutenant Governor
$542,663
3
$180,888
 Governor
$117,464
4
$29,366
 Supreme Court
$11,837
1
$11,837
 Land Commissioner
$10,000
1
$10,0000
 Ct Criminal Appeals
$5,000
1
$5,0000
 Attorney General
$777
1
$777
TOTALS:
$687,741
11
$62,522

Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst accounted for a remarkable 76 percent of all debt assumed by candidates for statewide office. Kinky Friedman’s $110,000 loan represents the bulk of the gubernatorial debt. Two candidates for the state’s top civil and criminal courts borrowed a total of $16,837. Failed 2002 land commissioner candidate Kenn George also reported a $10,000 loan this cycle.

Candidates borrowed 71 percent of the total campaign-loan money from their own personal funds, led by self-financing machine David Dewhurst. Candidates’ businesses and family members accounts for another 6 percent of this cycle’s total campaign debt. Candidates borrowed just 18 percent of their campaign money from commercial lenders.

Campaign Debts By Lender Source

 Loan Source
Total
Loans
No. of
Loans
Average
Loan
 Recipient candidate (self)
$6,423,799
705
$9,112
 Commercial lender
$1,590,710
56
$28,406
 Family member
$479,154
51
$9,395
 Other individuals
$395,047
31
$12,743
 Candidate-related business
$105,403
14
$7,529
 Other entities
$6,450.00
6
$1,075
 Other campaign or PAC
$2,950
2
$1,475
TOTALS:
$9,003,513
865
$10,409

Bypassing commercial lenders resulted in enviable financing costs, with most campaigns reporting zero-interest loans. In a probable typo, Nancy McCoy, a Democrat running for Conroe’s 284th State District Court, reported a 1,000 percent interest rate on a $1,000 personal loan to her campaign.

The next highest reported interest rate came from James George Sales, a GOP candidate for Corpus’ 94th State District Court. He reported that the First National Bank lent him $40,000 at a brutal 19 percent interest rate. Runner up Gloria Saldana, a Democratic challenger running for San Antonio’s 224th District Court, borrowed $6,500 from the San Antonio City Employees Federal Credit Union at 17 percent.

Vicky Rudy, a House District 16 candidate from Montgomery, demanded a relatively hefty 11 percent interest rate when she lent her own campaign $10,000. Yet Rudy was proven to be a keen judge of credit risk when she lost the GOP primary with just 23 percent of the vote.

Tim Kleinschmidt, the GOP candidate for House District 17, put up his life insurance policy to secure a $20,000 loan from Round Top State Bank. In lending $825 to Jim Sharp, a Democratic candidate for Houston’s First Court of Appeals, the candidate’s wife reportedly demanded as collateral “domestic tranquility in the pursuit of justice.”■


1   Texas Election Code §253.042.