[ Lowering the Bar: Lawyers Keep Texas Appeals Judges on Retainer IV. Who Bankrolls the Justices? |
A. Contributions By Donor Size
Major donors of $1,000 or more accounted for 73 percent of the $6.8 million in appeals court contributions studied in this report; mega-donors of $10,000 or more accounted for 24 percent of the total. Most Texas households could not afford to contribute $1,000 to a judicial candidate—even if they wanted to. These large donations fuel perceptions that justice is for sale in Texas.
Contributions By Donor Size
Donors Who
Gave Justices:Total Contributions Donor Count Percent
of TotalLess than $500 $1,133,311 7,73517% $500 - $999 $723,355 1,28411% $1,000 - $4,999 $2,303,025 1,37034% $5,000 - $9,999 $1,051,587 17415% $10,000 or more $1,613,180 7124% TOTALS: $6,824,458 10,634100%
B. Lawyer Money Dominates
The perceived inequities of this system are compounded further by the fact that donors in the Lawyers & Lobbyists sector gave district appeals justices $4.9 million, or 72 percent of their total campaign funds. With lobbyists and related interests accounting for a negligible $11,682 of this sector’s total, the justices took close to three-fourths of their campaign money from lawyers and law firms—the very donors who have the most recurring interest in the rulings of these courts. The remaining 28 percent of the justices’ money came from non-lawyer individuals (22 percent) and institutional PACs and businesses other than law firms (6 percent).
Lawyer Money Dominates
Donor Contributions Percent Lawyers & Law Firms $4,901,91372% Individual Non-Lawyer Donors $1,501,17922% Institutional Non-Law Donors $421,3666% TOTALS: $6,824,458100%
1. Dependency On Lawyer Money Is Increasing
Election
CycleLawyer & Law Firm Contributions Lawyers & Law Firms
Share of Total1996 $300,16061% 1998 $835,02166% 2000 $2,499,36174% 2002 $1,267,37076% TOTALS: $4,901,91372% Texas’ district appeals justices increased their dependence on attorney contributions steadily over the four election cycles analyzed in this report. Sitting justices who won office in 1996 obtained 61 percent of their money from lawyers and law firms, while justices just elected in 2002 obtained 76 percent of their campaign money from attorney interests.
2. Lawyer Dependency By District
District Share of Money
Raised From Lawyerss1-Houston 73% 2-Fort Worth 68% 3-Austin 67% 4-San Antonio 69% 5-Dallas 89% 6-Texarkana 48% 7-Amarillo 70% 8-El Paso 89% 9-Beaumont 67% 10-Waco 41% 11-Eastland 33% 12-Tyler 23% 13-Corpus 88% 14-Houston 87% TOTAL:72% The dependency of the justices on lawyer contributions varied by district, ranging from a high of 89 percent of all money raised in Dallas’ Fifth District and El Paso’s Eighth District to a low of 23 percent in Tyler’s Twelfth District. Generally, larger courts in major metropolitan areas had larger war chests and a greater dependency on lawyer contributions.
3. Lawyer Dependency By Party
Party No. of
Races WonTotal Money
RaisedAmount of Money
From AttorneysShare of
MoneyRaised
From LawyersDem. 24 $2,753,729 $2,248,32182% Rep. 63 $4,070,729 $2,653,59165% TOTAL: 87 $6,824,458 $4,901,91272% Democratic justices generally took a much larger share of their campaign money from lawyers than their Republican counterparts. Attorneys accounted for an average of 82 percent of winning Democratic war chests and 65 percent of winning GOP war chests. This may reflect a narrower fundraising base among Democratic judicial candidates as well as the electoral shift that has forced winning Democratic judicial candidates to raise an average of 78 percent more money than their Republican counterparts.
4. Lawyer Dependency Rankings of Justices
While the justices took an average of 72 percent of their money from lawyers and law firms, 19 of the 87 campaigns turned to lawyers for at least 90 percent or their money and five incumbent justices with small war chests took all of their money from lawyers.8 Corpus Christi Justice Dori Contreras Garza took 96 percent of her $266,072 from attorneys (with 19 percent coming from the Law offices of Michael Garza and Dori Contreras Garza). Houston Justices Charles Seymore and Scott Brister raised more than $100,000, with attorneys supplying 90 percent of their money.
Most Lawyer-Dependent Justices
Justice Election
YearDist. Running Status Amount
RaisedShare From
LawyersRichard Barajas (D) 1996 8 Incumbent $4,800100% Joseph B. Morris (R) 2000 5 Incumbent $16,550100% James 'Ed' Kinkeade (R) 2000 5 Incumbent $11,000100% Linda B. Thomas (R) 2000 5 Incumbent $3,500100% Mark Whittington (R) 2002 5 Incumbent $24,500100% Molly M. Francis (R) 2002 5 Incumbent $39,50099% Kerry P. Fitzgerald (R) 2002 5 Incumbent $31,57099% Richard H. Edelman (R) 2000 14 Incumbent $35,47598% David L. Bridges (R) 2002 5 Incumbent $37,60097% Carolyn Wright (R) 1998 5 Incumbent $35,80097% Dori Contreras Garza (D) 2002 13 Open $266,07296% Linda Reyna Yanez (D) 1998 13 Incumbent $64,76095% Kerry P. Fitzgerald (R) 2000 5 Open $36,64595% Michael J. O'Neill (R) 1998 5 Open $89,86595% William G. 'Bud' Arnot (D) 2000 11 Incumbent $12,12591% Carolyn Wright (R) 1996 5 Incumbent $32,50091% Charles W. Seymore (R) 2000 14 Challenger $104,06090% Scott Brister (R) 2000 1 Open $243,70890% Richard Barajas (D) 2002 8 Incumbent $31,13390%
Least Lawyer-Dependent Justices
Justice Election
YearDist. Running Status Amount
RaisedShare From
LawyersTimothy G.Taft (R) 2000 1 Incumbent $5,2220% James T. Worthen (R) 1998 12 Challenger $114,8463% David Puryear (R) 2000 3 Challenger $87,4679% Dixon W. Holman (R) 1996 2 Incumbent $5,5009% Dixon W. Holman (R) 2002 2 Incumbent $3,00017% Terry McCall (R) 1998 11 Open $75,97622% Josh R. Morriss (R) 2002 6 Incumbent $101,49125% Rex D. Davis (R) 1996 10 Incumbent $82,88231% Errlinda Castillo (D) 2000 13 Open $2,40038% Sandee Bryan Marion (R) 2002 4 Incumbent $88,14138% Rex D. Davis (R) 2000 10 Incumbent $79,80042% Thomas W. Gray (R) 1998 10 Open $93,93942% David B. Gaultney (R) 2000 9 Open $198,05043% Karen A. Angelini (R) 1998 4 Incumbent $157,25545% Samuel M. Nuchia (R) 1996 1 Open $76,92147% Terrie Livingston (R) 1996 2 Incumbent $41,21547% At the other end of the spectrum, attorneys supplied less than half of the money raised by justices in 16 winning campaigns, including none of the modest war chest of Houston Justice Timothy Taft, whose wife supplied one-third of his money. Just two justices who raised more than $100,000 obtained 25 percent or less from attorneys: Tyler Justice James Worthen (who self-financed 85 percent of his 1998 war chest) and Texarkana Justice Josh Morriss.
Contributions to the justices from the legal profession are concentrated. The top 50 firms supplied more than $1.7 million (see accompanying table), which accounts for 26 percent of all the money analyzed in this study and 36 percent of all attorney money. Led by $172,356 from Vinson & Elkins’ PAC and attorneys, the top three sources of attorney cash were Houston-based corporate defense firms. Dallas-based plaintiff firm Baron & Budd ranked No. 4, with $77,018. The justices receive a steady stream of cases from the major defense and plaintiff firms that bankroll their election campaigns.
Top Law Firm Donors
Law Firm (PAC and Attorney donations) Amount Texas Base *Favorite Judge(s) Vinson & ElkinsD $172,356Houston Scott Brister Fulbright & JaworskiD $97,580Houston Scott Brister Baker & BottsD $88,462Houston Scott Brister Baron & BuddP $77,018Dallas James A. Moseley Haynes & BooneD $70,050Dallas Fitzgerald/James Locke Liddell & SappD $60,275Dallas Kem Thompson Frost Michael J. Garza & Dori Contreras GarzaP $50,100McAllen Dori Contreras Garza Andrews & Kurth Mayer Day Caldwell…D $46,650Houston Scott Brister Perry HaasP $45,000Corpus Dori Contreras Garza Edwards Law FirmP $43,250Corpus Dori Contreras Garza Gardere Wynne Sewell & RiggsD $42,900Dallas Martin E. Richter Soules & WallaceD $42,900San Antonio Catherine M. Stone MehaffyWeberD $39,658Beaumont David B. Gaultney Winstead Sechrest & MinickD $38,700Dallas Kem Thompson Frost Jackson WalkerD $37,150Dallas Scott Brister Constant & VelaP $37,000Corpus Garza/Rodriguez/Valdez Thompson & KnightD $36,180Dallas James A. Moseley Hughes & LuceD $33,943Dallas Jan P. Patterson Bracewell & PattersonD $31,949Houston Scott Brister Jenkens & GilchristD $31,515Dallas Anne L. Gardner Law Offices of Pat MaloneyP $31,500San Antonio Alma L. Lopez Watts Law FirmP $30,206Corpus Frederico Hinojosa Jr. Dawson & Sodd $27,500Corsicana Thomas W. Gray O'Quinn Laminack & PirtleP $25,950Houston Sarah B. Duncan Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & FeldD $25,220Dallas Catherine M. Stone Strasburger & PriceD $24,475Dallas Kem Thompson Frost Susman GodfreyD $24,000Houston Kem Thompson Frost Cantey & Hanger Roan & AutreyD $23,625Fort Worth Lee Ann Dauphinot McDonald Clay Crow & McGartlandP $23,489Dallas Lee Ann Dauphinot Gibbs & BrunsD $23,000Houston Scott Brister Maloney & MaloneyP $22,750San Antonio Alma L. Lopez Kelly Hart & HallmanD $21,775Fort Worth Anne L. Gardner Huerta & AllisonP $21,700Corpus Alma L. Lopez Lyons & RhodesP $21,500San Antonio Alma L. Lopez Phil Watkins, PCP $21,350San Antonio Catherine M. Stone Howie & SweeneyP $21,180Dallas Donnie R. Burgess Wyatt Law FirmP $21,000Corpus Alma L. Lopez Jose Henry Brantley & KeltnerP $20,500Fort Worth Dauphinot/Walker Shannon Gracey Ratliff & MillerD $19,881Fort Worth Anne L. Gardner Orgain Bell & TuckerD $17,925Beaumont Donnie R. Burgess Fleming & AssociatesP $17,750Houston Scott Brister Person Whitworth Ramos Borchers…D $17,600Laredo Alma L. Lopez McKool Smith $17,500Dallas Lee Ann Dauphinot Reaud Morgan & QuinnP $17,500Beaumont Donnie R. Burgess Beirne Maynard & ParsonsD $17,250Houston Alcala/Brister/Frost Mithoff & JacksP $17,058Houston Jan P. Patterson Provost & UmphreyP $16,600Beaumont Donnie R. Burgess William J. Tinning, PCP $16,500Portland Rodriguez/Valdez Hall & BatesP $16,000San Antonio Alma L. Lopez Law Office of Ramon GarciaP $16,000Edinburg Hinojosa/Valdez TOTAL: $1,760,920D = Defense Firm; P = Plaintiff Firm.
*"Favorite Judge(s)" is calculated per election cycle (to account for justices who ran twice).
After Lawyers & Lobbyists, the next-largest group of donors—accounting for 7 percent of all the money—is the “Other” category, dominated by civil servants and public officials. Thirty-seven percent of this sector’s money comes from: Judicial candidates themselves; Transfers between two PACs of the same judicial candidate; or Donations from the PACs of other politicians. The largest self donors were Justice James Worthen ($97,778) and Justice Terry McCall ($22,153).
C. Contributions By Other Economic Interests
Interest Contributions Percent
of TotalAgriculture $46,2901% Communications $23,4550% Construction $114,9772% Electronics $10,3550% Energy & Natural Resources $206,5863% Finance $226,7663% Health $179,7573% Ideological $106,7052% Insurance $43,0151% Labor $17,2500% Lawyers & Lobbyists $4,912,27072% Miscellaneous Business $122,2442% Other $467,5077% Real Estate $77,8601% Transportation $66,0171% Unknown $201,2083% TOTALS: $6,824,458100% The next-largest sector, “Finance,” supplied $226,766, or just 3 percent of the total money raised.
D. Top Non-Lawyer Donors
Texas’ intermediate appeals court justices rely on lawyers and law firms for most of their campaign money, filling a comparatively modest 28 percent of their campaign coffers ($1,922,545) from other sources. This is hardly surprising, given that few non-lawyers know the names of these justices—much less their records. This leaves a small core of commercial interests that give heavily to these judicial campaigns. Most of these big donors have been parties to state court cases.The top tier of these non-lawyer donors is dominated by PACs and employees of major sources of state political money that have direct interests in the legal decisions of state courts. These big donors include Fort Worth’s oil-rich Bass family, the Texas Medical Association, Houston homebuilder Bob Perry and Texans for Lawsuit Reform. The second tier of these donors, however, includes some lesser-known, regional commercial interests that do not rank as Texas political king makers, such as Beaumont construction firm Conex International and McAllen beer distributor L & F Distributors. Not surprisingly, many second-tier donors appear to have gotten involved in appeals court campaigns as a result of litigation that landed them in these courts.
Top Non-Lawyer Donors
Source (PACs and Employees) Amount Location *Favorite Judge(s) Bass family (diversified oil fortune) $59,500Fort Worth Anne L. Gardner Texas Medical Association $26,434Austin David B. Gaultney Perry Homes $24,750Houston Brister/Jennings Texans for Lawsuit Reform $19,500Houston David B. Gaultney Associated Republicans of Texas $17,335Austin David Puryear International Bank of Commerce $17,227Laredo Alma L. Lopez Conex Internat'l (gen'l contractors) $17,000Beaumont Donnie Burgess L & F Distributors (beer distributor) $13,500McAllen Hinojosa/Lopez Reliant Energy $12,905Houston Scott Brister Duncan Truck (dealership) $10,500Waco Sarah B. Duncan Tepito Electronics (appliances) $10,000Laredo Alma L. Lopez FirstCity Financial Corp. $9,750Waco Thomas W. Gray Truman Arnold Co's (wholesale gas) $9,700Texarkana Josh R. Morriss BexarPAC (doctors) $9,000San Antonio Karen A. Angelini Jani-King (janitorial franchiser) $8,100Addison James A. Moseley TETCO, Inc. (wholesale gas) $8,000San Antonio Lopez/Stone Texan Land/Taub Investments $7,925Houston Samuel M. Nuchia Laredo National Bank $7,100Laredo Alma L. Lopez SBC Corp. (Southwestern Bell) $7,028San Antonio Paul W. Green Texas Automobile Dealers Assoc. $7,000Austin Jan P. Patterson Offenhauser & Co. (insurance agent) $6,652Texarkana Josh R. Morriss Flournoy Exploration (oil & gas) $6,500Alice Alma L. Lopez Killam Oil Co. (oil & gas) $6,450Laredo Alma L. Lopez Beaumont Bone & Joint $6,300Beaumont David B. Gaultney Chiles Survivors Trust (oil fortune) $6,250Fort Worth Lee Ann Dauphinot H.B. Zachry Co.(gen'l contractors) $6,212San Antonio Paul W. Green †TX Bipartisan Justice Com. $6,133Longview Kenneth Mack Kidd TOTAL: $346,751†Medical, engineering and other business tort interests.
*"Favorite Judge(s)" is calculated per election cycle (to account for justices who ran twice).
Bell’s Direct Line
Southwestern Bell v. Virginia Pawlik Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio Southwestern Bell employee Virginia Pawlik accused her employer of negligently investigating her complaint that her ex-boyfriend—another Southwestern Bell employee—illicitly wiretapped her phone. A jury awarded Pawlik a $495,000 judgment in actual and exemplary damages. Ruling that there was no evidence that SBC Corp.’s Southwestern Bell
failed to reasonably investigate Pawlik’s complaint, three Fourth Court
of Appeals justices reversed the trial court’s judgment in 1998 to rule
in Bell’s favor. One of these justices, Paul Green, tapped SBC executives
and lawyers for $1,550 for his 2000 campaign. The top SBC donor, SBC Communications
General Counsel James Ellis, gave him $1,000.
|
Amador Cruz’s Spring Break
L & F Distributor v. Amador G. Cruz Thirteenth Court of Appeals, Corpus Christi Spring break was no party for Amador Cruz. The beer warehouse where he worked forced him to work long weekend hours to keep college kids lubed on Padre Island. When he complained about forced overtime, L & F Distributors fired him. Cruz filed suit, seeking overtime pay and damages for retalitory discrimination. A jury ruled in Cruz’s favor on both points, but the trial judge rendered a take-nothing judgment on the overtime award. Thirteenth Court of Appeals justices reversed the trial court in December
1996, vacating the retaliation judgment but reinstating Cruz’s overtime
award. Justice Federico Hinojosa’s dissenting opinion would have rendered
a take-nothing judgment on both of Cruz’s claims. Three years later, L
& F President Joe La Mantia poured $5,000 into Justice Hinojosa’s campaign.
|
Conex’s Winning Hand
Conex International Corp. v. James R. Cox Ninth Court of Appeals, Beaumont Worker James Cox said that Beaumont construction company Conex International retaliated against him by firing him after he filed for workers’ compensation for an on-the-job hand injury. Conex appealed a jury’s award of $48,200 for Cox’s injuries. Ninth District Court of Appeals justices reversed the trial court in June 2000, ordering Cox to go away empty handed. Conex executives contributed $17,000 to winning Ninth District candidates
from 1998 through 2000, including $15,000 to Justice Don Burgess. Justice
Burgess' concurring opinion in the case lamented that Texas law precludes
workers from recovering damages once they accept workers’ compensation
benefits.
|
8 This report analyzes donations of $100 or more when candidates did not file electronically.